Author: Penny Lane
For a technology company without a full in-house marketing and sales team, getting campaigns into market can feel like the obvious first step. But activity is not the same as progress. If the audience is too broad, the message is unclear or the systems are not ready to capture responses, more activity may simply make the gaps harder to see.
The opening phase of a go-to-market engagement is about making the work that follows more deliberate. That means agreeing who the business is trying to reach, what it needs those buyers to understand, how activity will be managed and what the first campaign is designed to learn.
It does not mean waiting until every detail is perfect. A useful foundation creates a clear, testable starting point, and gives the team a way to learn once campaigns begin.
Start with the market the business can serve
The first conversations are usually about context: what the company sells, what stage it is at, where growth is expected to come from and what has already been tried. That includes speaking with the people closest to the market, often founders or leadership, sales, product and customer-facing colleagues.
The aim is to separate assumptions from evidence. Which customers have been the best fit so far? What problem brought them to the business? Who was involved in the decision? What caused a conversation to move forward, or stall?
For companies selling into Retail, Digital Commerce and Financial Services, these questions matter because each market has its own buying environment. A compelling proposition for a smaller business may need different proof and language when presented to a larger organisation. The business may also need to account for multiple stakeholders, longer evaluation processes or specific operational requirements.
From this initial review, the team can identify the patterns worth exploring, and the gaps that need attention before campaign planning moves too far.
Define an ICP that helps the team make choices
An ideal customer profile (ICP) is most useful when it informs decisions, not when it is simply a description of a broad market. “Retail businesses” or “financial services companies” may be a place to start, but they do not yet tell a team which accounts to prioritise or what message is likely to resonate.
The work is to narrow the focus. Which type of organisation has the problem the business is equipped to solve? What circumstances make that problem more urgent? Who experiences it, who evaluates possible solutions and who has a say in the decision?
The resulting ICP should be practical enough to guide targeting and content. It should also include signals that suggest a prospect is not a good fit. Being clear about those boundaries helps prevent teams from pursuing every possible opportunity with the same message.
An ICP is a working hypothesis, not a permanent label. It should reflect the evidence available now, then be reviewed as the business learns from conversations and campaign responses.
Turn the proposition into buyer-ready language
Once the intended audience is clearer, positioning and messaging can become more specific. The goal is to explain, in language buyers recognise, what problem the company addresses, who it is for and why the proposition is relevant.
This often takes more than a polished headline. Teams need to agree which benefits matter most to different stakeholders, what evidence supports the claims and which questions or objections are likely to come up. A business buyer may focus on the organisational result; a technical evaluator may want to understand how an offer works in practice. Both perspectives need to make sense within the same proposition.
Early messaging should be treated as a version to test, not a finished piece of brand language. Customer conversations, sales discussions and feedback from the market can reveal where the wording feels vague, where a claim needs stronger proof and which terms people naturally use to describe the problem.
That feedback loop helps prevent a common mistake: producing campaign material around a message the company understands internally, but buyers do not immediately recognise.
Get the systems ready for real conversations
Campaign planning depends on more than a list of channels. Before activity begins, the team needs to know how responses will be recorded, who will follow up and how progress will be reviewed.
The initial systems review might cover the customer relationship management system, contact and account records, website enquiries, analytics and existing campaign activity. The aim is not to introduce unnecessary complexity. It is to establish clear enough rules for the team to work consistently.
That may mean agreeing how contacts are categorised, which information is essential, how enquiries are assigned and what happens after a first conversation. It also means checking that the team can distinguish meaningful engagement from activity that does not indicate buying intent.
Where information is incomplete, it is better to make the limitation visible than to imply a level of measurement the systems cannot support. Reliable, straightforward reporting gives the team a more useful basis for deciding what to change next.
Plan a campaign with a clear purpose
With the audience, message and working systems in view, the team can shape an initial campaign plan. A good brief connects a specific business objective to a defined audience, a relevant problem, an offer or next step, and a way to assess the response.
The channel choice should follow the audience and the buying context, rather than habit. The campaign might use a combination of targeted outreach, useful content, a focused landing page or another route suited to how potential buyers gather information. The important point is that the parts work together and have clear ownership.
The plan should also identify what the team expects to learn. Is the audience definition proving useful? Does the message prompt the right conversations? Are responses reaching the right person? If those questions are agreed in advance, early results can inform decisions instead of being reduced to a tally of activity.
What the first 90 days look like in practice
The sequence will vary with the company’s starting point, but the work often unfolds in three overlapping stages:
Early weeks: understand and align. Review the existing proposition, customer evidence, sales context and current activity. Develop an initial ICP and agree what the business needs its GTM work to achieve.
Middle weeks: build the working foundation. Refine positioning and messaging, address the most important systems and process gaps, and prepare a campaign brief with relevant materials and clear responsibilities.
Later weeks: put the plan into practice and learn. Launch a focused first campaign when the audience, message and response process are sufficiently clear. Review what happens, gather feedback and identify what to adjust before extending the activity.
These are not sealed stages. A market conversation may change the ICP; a systems review may uncover a missing hand-off; early campaign feedback may reveal that a message needs refinement. The point is to use each finding to improve the next decision.
By day 90, clarity matters as much as activity
A campaign going live is visible. Less visible, but just as important, is whether the team can explain who it is targeting, why the message should matter, how responses will be handled and what evidence will guide the next move.
A useful review at this point brings together the original hypotheses and what the team has learned. Which audience signals look promising? Which parts of the proposition are landing clearly? Where is the process working, and where are responses getting stuck? What should be continued, narrowed or rethought?
The outcome should be a more informed next plan, not a claim that every question has been resolved. In markets with considered buying decisions, learning is part of the work. A focused test can show where further effort is justified, and where the team should pause before doing more of the same.
For technology companies selling into Retail, Digital Commerce or Financial Services, this kind of groundwork makes the move into market more coherent. It connects positioning, systems and campaign activity to the realities of the business and its buyers.
Finative’s embedded GTM partnership begins with a foundation phase covering ICP definition, positioning and messaging, systems setup and campaign planning, so delivery starts from a validated plan rather than a blank page. To discuss the starting point for your team, get in touch.
Office: +44 20 4620 4946